To my dear friend WJJ Hoge III of Westminster, MD. Now that you have my home address, I’d like to offer a bit of culinary advice for tbe people you send here to either harm or harass me.
No visit to Clinton, Iowa, is complete without a dinner at Rastrelli’s on Main Ave. in the Lyons shopping district. I’ve been a fan of the chow at Rastrelli’s since the early 1960s and they never disappoint. I just polished off a delicious lasagna, some wonderful homemade bread and a slice of cheesecake to die for. So make sure whoever you send to harm and harass me takes a few minutes to call ahead for take out. They’ll thank me.
Now, onto business. I went out to the radio station this afternoon to get my final paycheck. There was an envelope from you addressed to me. So, for the record, I received this document on March 31, 2017.
This is a “request for admission of facts and genuineness of documents.” I really should not have tried to read it while eating my lasagna. I almost choked while laughing.
Now, I know you didn’t write this yourself, John. This is beyond your usual standard for stupidity. This is full-on “Aaron Walker” stupidity. The fact that you and your disgraced attorney friend believe these things to be true goes a long way to explain why you’ve spent four years harassing me.
Oh, don’t worry, you’ll get a formal response within your 30 days. But I just couldn’t wait to laugh at you and Aaron tonight.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #1. The allegations you made against plaintiff William Hoge referenced in Count IV of the complaint are false.
Well, the only allegation I seem to have made in Count IV is, “Matt, that was an appropriately brutal and true depiction of events.” I’m not sure what you want me to admit to, John. Am I to admit that the depictions were appropriately brutal? Or am I supposed to admit that that was a true depiction of events? I can’t crawl into your head Mr. Hoge. Nor would I want to without industrial-strength hip waders. Therefore, to keep it simple, let’s take the statement as a whole. “Matt, that was an appropriately brutal and true depiction of events.” That’s how I saw it at the time big fella, and the fact that a judge read you the riot act over your treatment of my co-defendants young daughter leads me to believe she thought it was a brutal and true depiction of events as well, just not enough to sustain a charge against you. In other words, I deny the allegation is false.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #2. You know the allegations against plaintiff William Hoge referenced in Count IV of the complaint or false when you made them in 2015.
Nonsense. Lying is a Hoge thing. I assumed at the time I made the comment that it was true. I still believe, even though you ducked punishment for it, that it was true. Do you really want to quibble over the term, “appropriately brutal and true”? I didn’t write the story. I just commented with my opinion.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #3. You exercise effective managerial control over the Breitbart Unmasked website.
Uh, no. I exercise effective managerial control only over what I write.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #4. You exercise effective editorial control over the Breitbart Unmasked website.
Again, I exercise effective editorial control ONLY over what I write.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #5. You have written and/or commented on the Breitbart Unmasked website under the pseudonyms Mark in MD, MarkinMD or MarkMD.
I actually spit out a little leftover lasagna while laughing at that one. No, I have never used those pseudonyms.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #6. You have written and/or commented on the Breitbart Unmasked website under the pseudonym Westminster Winds.
No. Not once. Never. In fact, I kind of thought that was you referring to the stench that likely emanates from your residence in Westminster.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #7. Some or all of the operating expenses for the Breitbart Unmasked website have been paid by Justice Through Music Project.
Your guess is as good as mine, stew meat. As I am not privy to the business dealings of Justice Through Music Project I have no idea how or where they spend their money.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #8. Some or all of the operating expenses for the Breitbart Unmasked website have been paid by Velvet Revolution US.
Beats the hell out of me, poop flake. As I am not privy to the business dealings of Velvet Revolution, I have no idea if they pay for the website or bought bicycles for everybody in Oprah Winfrey’s audience.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #9. You are the author of the email referenced in Count III of the complaint.
Absolutely Untrue. But I believe you to be the source of numerous phone calls, and emails trying to get me kicked out of an apartment complex and trying to cost me a part-time job at a radio station. I just don’t have any proof of that, therefore I do not raise it in any legal sense.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION #10. (There is no Request for Admission #10.)
Therefore there is no response to the missing Request for Admission #10.
I don’t have an ownership interest in anything concerning you, Brett Kimberlin, or much of anything else for that matter. I have an intellectual interest in seeing you declared a vexatious litigant so that you will finally be forced by law to leave innocent folks alone. But other than that, nope! No ownership interest.
There. That felt good, didn’t it, John? Now, please tell Mr. Walker that the number 10 comes right after the number 9, and that a good lawyer would not skip from 9 to 11 unless he had a good reason.
As mentioned earlier, you will receive your formal response within 30 days.
But for now, go fuck yourself. Hard.